Apple needs and intervention. A while back I wrote an article on Apple's "thinness", their insatiable desire to make everything as lite as possible. I was, after much thought, going to write a followup saying that perhaps it isn't a bad thing, that most laptops now are following suit, but then the 2016 MacBook Pro happened. At first I thought it wasn't bad, I like the touch bar, the design, the space grey color, and that finally understood what what makes good speakers. As you dig deeper, it goes from an interesting piece of technology, to an overpriced door stop that makes me want to abandon Apple like a sinking ship.
Is there a point where simplifying something so much that it actually becomes more complicated? The YouTube channel "Cold Fusion" (linked below) discussed this in detail in regards to the new MacBook Pro. It seems to be a trend in apple's overall design, simplifying design to the point where function is ignored.
When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in the late 1990s, he took a company that had lost it's direction and turned it into a juggernaut that would dominate computer design. He pushed form, function, and power, creating devices that would improve our lives and look good doing it to. Many companies followed Apple's direction (some got sued) and Apple became the trendsetter for computers and devices. Under Jobs they created the iPod, iPhone, and iPad, his introduction of the iMac revolutionized computer styling, and whenApple switched to intel ushering in a new era of powerful desktops and laptop more compatible with their PC brethren.
In 2011, Steve Jobs passed away, bringing an end to his version of the Meiji Restoration. The question was, could Apple continue the momentum? Tim Cook seceded Jobs as the CEO of Apple, while he hasn't pushed Apple back to the Pre-Steve Jobs 1990s era, many would agree that he his moving in that direction. Under Cook, Apple's have become thinner and lighter, but at the expense of the versatility and functionality that made the Macintosh such a reliable machine. The most recent MacBook Pro, for example, has almost no upgradeable parts and USB-C/Thunderbolt-3 ports that aren't universally adopted.
Compare the new MacBook Pro to my Mid-2012 model. While it doesn't have a Retina display and a fast battery, it has interchangeable RAM and Hard Drive (upgraded mine to a 1TB SSD), and a replace able battery. An intel i7 running at 2.9GHz. It still uses MagSafe if someone trips over the cable. A lineup of universally accepted ports. Finally a DVD superdrive that can interchanged with a second hard drive bay. It doesn't use current technology, it could out pace newer laptops and will likely prove itself still useful in the coming years.
The Bloomberg article (linked below) makes Apple's intentions clear, the focus is on the iPad, iPhone, and iOS, and that way of thinking has infected the way new Mac's are made. The iPhone has less ports, and so will the mac, and now there is no division dedicated to the development Mac Os. The Macintosh is a much smaller part of Apple's revenue stream, however a lot of creative professionals use them because of how the hardware and software is attuned to their creative needs. A lot of them are now forced to question that, and we are either being forced to compromise with a dozen dongles and poor battery life, or switch to a windows platform.
It feels like Apple has put more effort into the iPad pro, and with it's keyboard case and "Apple Pen" than it did with the new MacBook Pro with it's gimmicky touch bar. The problem is, the iPad pro can run full adobe programs like the Microsoft Surface line, which now has a touch screen desktop in its line up, something that Apple's resident village idiot Phil Shiller says no one would want (the article below from "Product Review shows a modern reimagine of the iMac G4 that would be amazing). Shiller also feels sad if you use an older Mac, sorry I won't help pay for your second house.
Apple really needs to figure out it's priorities; is it to make high end professional machines or appeal to the fashion sense of Millennial hipsters? Those of us who use Macs in our lives, home and at work have some serious questions to ask ourselves because it's clear that Apple is shifting it's priorities from the Mac line. For now my Mid 2012 MacBook Pro will keep trudging along, and aside from the screen quality, it still feels like a new computer, it doesn't want to quit. Perhaps they'll get the message, there is always hope that if their numbers go down, maybe they'll have a double take. There is always the Hackitosh if that does't work......
Sources:
http://www.macrumors.com/2016/11/23/jony-ive-speculation-role/
http://www.product-reviews.net/2016/11/15/apple-reaffirms-stance-on-touchscreen-imac-will-never-be-released/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xp4ypElIp2M
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-20/how-apple-alienated-mac-loyalists
Friday, December 23, 2016
Saturday, November 26, 2016
A Final Thought
Before delve into my review of "The Grand Tour" and once more complain about Apple's lack of "Appleness", I will say a fee last words about the election. The level to which people have taken the results of the election two weeks ago forces to the question of whether or we should just abolish the Presidency altogether. Obviously that would be a terrible I idea, but with proliferation of social media and the media's coverage are at the point of being intolerable.
We have no one to blame but ourselves for the results of this election. We're the ones who listened to the media, listened to the candidates, and decided based upon party rather than on principle. Instead of picking from the top shelf in the primaries, we drove our hands directly in the cesspool of American society and politics. Neither candidate was the ideal choice, yet they were made the front runners. And when the third parties tried to give you an alternative, you all still didn't listen.
The American voter is more dazzled by a sensationalized campaign, than a look at the actual facts. We want everything in bite sized tweets so we don't have to think real hard or read for a few seconds. It's probably the reason Apple can make computers that are almost useless and Samsung can make a phone that explodes and still make a profit.
I beg everyone, in 2020, please think about the candidates presented before. Do your research and stop listening to what the main stream media and the hype of social media. It is tiresome have to always pick between the lesser of two evils or a third party no one listens too. This campaign and it's aftermath have probably jaded more people to the political process than any other campaign. Every four years we have two terrible candidates that no one wants, despite being the people's choice, and then complain about the result and blame it on everything else but ourselves.
We have no one to blame but ourselves for the results of this election. We're the ones who listened to the media, listened to the candidates, and decided based upon party rather than on principle. Instead of picking from the top shelf in the primaries, we drove our hands directly in the cesspool of American society and politics. Neither candidate was the ideal choice, yet they were made the front runners. And when the third parties tried to give you an alternative, you all still didn't listen.
The American voter is more dazzled by a sensationalized campaign, than a look at the actual facts. We want everything in bite sized tweets so we don't have to think real hard or read for a few seconds. It's probably the reason Apple can make computers that are almost useless and Samsung can make a phone that explodes and still make a profit.
I beg everyone, in 2020, please think about the candidates presented before. Do your research and stop listening to what the main stream media and the hype of social media. It is tiresome have to always pick between the lesser of two evils or a third party no one listens too. This campaign and it's aftermath have probably jaded more people to the political process than any other campaign. Every four years we have two terrible candidates that no one wants, despite being the people's choice, and then complain about the result and blame it on everything else but ourselves.
Wednesday, November 9, 2016
The End Result
Donald J. Trump will now be President of the United States of America, the most powerful world leader on the face of the Earth. In January he will sworn in and assume his new role and take the office. What started as a joke in the minds of Americans has become reality. How did this happen?
Let us go back in time, to the beginning, in 2015. The origins lay in the primaries, the early success of Rand Paul, Trump's rapid rise, and the massive movement behind Bernie Sanders. 2016 was the year of the outsider, a movement against the establishment. Even the third parties, particularly Gary Johnson gained more recognition than any other previous year (though it wasn't enough).
Many Americans are tired of the status quo, the established order. Dissatisfaction with the direction of the country, economy, and the continuous unending wars. People feel tired and disillusioned and are looking for a change. Obama promised "Hope and Change", and yes we did get a new health care system, troops were pulled out of Iraq, Osama Bin Laden is dead, Net Neutrality was protected, and LGBT rights were expanded. However people are facing rising prices on Obama care, the war on terror has expanded, the government's invasion of privacy hasn't ended, and not everyone is seeing an improvement in the economy. Many people see the government as an overbearing parent rather than an institution that is designed to with and for them.
The seeds of what happened last night were sown of the course of the last sixteen years through government regulation, intervention, and poor foreign policy. The President isn't the only one to blame though, one must look at Congress as well. They pass laws, approve the budget, and confirm the President's Supreme Court appointments. Our government was setup with checks and balances that prevent one group or person from having all the power.
I am still trying to comprehend what happened last night, only few times in American politics has anything this unprecedented happened. Though for the reasons stated above, we can understand why this happened. Granted, the requirements for being President are, that you have to be an American citizen and 35 years of age, but most have had some form of political experience.
This has been one of the most amusing, irritating, annoying, and frustrating elections that I have ever seen. What the next four years will entail is a mystery, who can say when the one entering office is an outsider to the political club.
This is a new frontier in American politics and who knows where it will lead, it could be good or bad, hopefully good. The only thing we can do is wait and see.
Let us go back in time, to the beginning, in 2015. The origins lay in the primaries, the early success of Rand Paul, Trump's rapid rise, and the massive movement behind Bernie Sanders. 2016 was the year of the outsider, a movement against the establishment. Even the third parties, particularly Gary Johnson gained more recognition than any other previous year (though it wasn't enough).
Many Americans are tired of the status quo, the established order. Dissatisfaction with the direction of the country, economy, and the continuous unending wars. People feel tired and disillusioned and are looking for a change. Obama promised "Hope and Change", and yes we did get a new health care system, troops were pulled out of Iraq, Osama Bin Laden is dead, Net Neutrality was protected, and LGBT rights were expanded. However people are facing rising prices on Obama care, the war on terror has expanded, the government's invasion of privacy hasn't ended, and not everyone is seeing an improvement in the economy. Many people see the government as an overbearing parent rather than an institution that is designed to with and for them.
The seeds of what happened last night were sown of the course of the last sixteen years through government regulation, intervention, and poor foreign policy. The President isn't the only one to blame though, one must look at Congress as well. They pass laws, approve the budget, and confirm the President's Supreme Court appointments. Our government was setup with checks and balances that prevent one group or person from having all the power.
I am still trying to comprehend what happened last night, only few times in American politics has anything this unprecedented happened. Though for the reasons stated above, we can understand why this happened. Granted, the requirements for being President are, that you have to be an American citizen and 35 years of age, but most have had some form of political experience.
This has been one of the most amusing, irritating, annoying, and frustrating elections that I have ever seen. What the next four years will entail is a mystery, who can say when the one entering office is an outsider to the political club.
This is a new frontier in American politics and who knows where it will lead, it could be good or bad, hopefully good. The only thing we can do is wait and see.
Tuesday, November 8, 2016
Sunday, September 18, 2016
On Being Catholic & The New Wars of Religion
There have been more truly horrific times in the history of this world. From 1914 to 1918 we fought the bloodiest war we have ever known. From 1939 to 1945 we fought the world's most destructive war, with acts of inhumanity so terrible that had never been seen before. And after that war, we lived in fear that nuclear missiles would rain down upon us, and that too eventually came to a conclusion.
In all that horror, what kept evil at bay? Simple kindness and mercy and love. The Christmas truce during World War I, a German fighter escorting a damaged U.S. bomber to safety and German and American troops sharing Christmas together on the coldest nights during the Battle of the Buldge of World War II.
I think it is said best in this quote from the "Hobbit" films:
"…I don't know. Saruman believes it is only great power that can hold evil in check. But that is not what I have found. I've found it is the small things, everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keeps the darkness at bay. Simple acts of kindness and love. Why Bilbo Baggins? Perhaps it is because I am afraid… and he gives me courage." - Gandalf.
In the legends and stories of Tolkien's "Middle-Earth, the concept of self-sacrifice is prevalent throughout his works. It's a very Christian concept to be willing give up one's life for another, that and generally being kind and helping to others. Today Christianity is associated with idea that it is a force that holds humanity back with it's demonization of science, and that as a religion, it is the source of war and evil in this world. Indeed, religion has been used as an excuse for war and the destruction of information. People have manipulated the concepts taught in religion to control others, it can be a terrifying source of power.
As a Catholic, I was never taught that my religion doesn't stop me from learning nor was it a source of power that controlled me. What I learned was more of being a good person and life lessons. Throughout my life I was never prevented from friending people who didn't share the same beliefs as me, in fact almost none of my friends are practicing Christians.
It wasn't until I was older that I saw the beliefs of other Christian denominations and the world's reactions. Christians who went out into the street and yelled at random people on the street, saying "you'll go to Hell if you don't convert." People who just seemed so blinded by their faith. I can appreciate a devotion to ones faith, but when it makes you so blind that you judge others without any knowledge, your no longer following the Christian ethic. "Judge not others, lest you be judged."
The media has take this recent tide of right-wing evangelical ideology and helped fume the flames of a "War on Religion." People who are religious, especially Christians, are bigots and hateful people who want to turn this country into a theocracy. But instead of focusing their reporting on the groups that preach hateful interpretations, they lump everyone into one group. All Christians are people who want to bring us back technologically and scientifically, and are violent hateful people who use the Bible as their justification. Those people exist, but they don't represent every Christian.
Being this time of year, lets ask the question below and look at whats going with religion in our society.
Is there a a war on Christmas?
This is a question with a yes and a no answer. Every year almost we hear on the news the "War on Christmas", how society is trying to remove it with sayings like "Happy Holidays", and this year the controversy over the minimalist Starbucks red cup. In reality, however, this isn't the truth, there really isn't a war. No one is stopping you from putting up a tree and decorating, shopping for presents, or celebrating in general, it's become very much a part of American society.
The true war on Christmas is the commercialization of the holiday. Images are broadcast on the news of people streaming into stores on Black Friday, like the orcs when they breach the gates of "Minas Tirth." They storm in for the deals and likely spend more on themselves than others. Moreover, Christmas has been turned into this period of intense shopping where we focus more on material processions than the true meaning of the holiday and that it's a time to spend with friends and loved ones. Gifts are a nice part of the holiday, but not everything.
Is there a war on Religion?
In this country at the world as a whole, yes there is. The push for secularism isn't a bad thing, secular countries tend to have more religious tolerance and acceptance. But there seems to be a push to completely push religion out of society totally. There is an idea that religion is holding society back on social issues and the advancement of technology, while historically this isn't necessarily true, there are religious elements today that do this. Evangelicals, especially the more fundamentalist ones, refuse to recognize parts of science that seemingly contradict with their literal interpretation of the "Bible." As well as demand that parts of society be suppressed for the same contradiction.
This, coupled with the rise of violent Islamic extremism, has led many to believe that religion is an evil in this, a relic that needs to be stamped out. It is the source of oppression, violence, war, and is anti-knowledge. Through media and especially social media, religion has been put down as a source of evil. But with the belittling and seeming hatred towards religion, many have sought a safe place with the more radical religious, a place where they can gather and be open with their faith. Not a bad thing, but this does have it's consequences, as many evangelicals have been aggressive in their efforts to convert, as was the scene at a Catholic church in Las Vegas (linked below).
It's the classic tale of two sides attacking one another, but only finding themselves strengthening the other. While it may seem that the atheists and non-religious are winning, faith can be a powerful motivator and weapon, again, just look at the Middle-east. Like a cornered cat, they will lash back with great ferocity.
As a Catholic, I feel myself set in this battle between both sides, disliked by each. The Evangelical / Protestant crowd has had a history of hate towards Catholics (not everyone), they consider us polytheists because of the "Trinity", worshipers of idols, and blind followers of the "devil" Pope. Meanwhile, atheists lump us in with the rest of religious extremists as bigots and hateful people. I can not express in "clean" words how much all this sends me into a rage. The accusations, insults, and belittling have made me feel completely unwelcome in this country, despite being third generation born here, and the media doesn't help. We're supposed to be a nation of tolerance and acceptance, but it only works on a double-standard depending upon who is in political power.
So, let me explain what it means for me to be Catholic. Historically, the Catholic Church have done some awful things, but they have also been the ones to fund social programs and many of the oldest universities in Europe. They worked towards the translation and preservation of classic works, this includes monks saving many Mayan and Aztec works of literature. They were also the patrons of art, and yes even science. The current calendar was created by a Pope in the 1500s, and the "big bang theory" was proposed by a Catholic priest. Monks were know to practice botany, and possibly as a result have made some of the best beer ever made, "Abbey Ale".
Being a Catholic doesn't mean blinding yourself to knowledge, nor trying to purge society of "undesirables." I've always looked at being a Catholic as spiritual and a moral guide to being a good person. We study the "Bible" in a analytical way, not literal, it's a collection of historical accounts, fables, psalms, and lessons. It was written by people trying to make sense of the world that they live in, thus it can't contradict science. However, science can not contradict the existence of God. The Universe is a vast and we know less than a fraction of what it contains. You CAN have your cake and eat it too.
I've come to believe that it wasn't physical appearance, but a creative spirt of God that we were created in the image of. There is a infinity to creativity, God, and the Universe. While yes, other creatures do have the ability to create very simple tools and shelters, none, of the complexity of human creative mind.
Finally, if there is one the thing I have gained from being Catholic is that, we're human, and we are not perfect, and to accept that. We are to strive to be better people and accept the flaws ourselves and others, and show respect. As I have said, I would never try to tell someone what to believe, I would need to be 100% secure in my faith, and part of the journey. I would help someone on that journey, but never force anyone into it. The Church itself is run by humans, thus it is an imperfect organization, but at it's core is a goal to help build a better world. I don't judge it by the people, including the clergy involved in the sex scandals, nor the few jackass priests I have met in my life.
In conclusion, religion is and will be a part of our society for the foreseeable future. People will believe in beings they can not see and follow the teachings with much vigor. If we are to move forward as a society we must accept these people, and recognize those who wish to use it as a means of power and control, as a means to spread fear and hate. Religion is not evil, only this who manipulate it for their own selfish means. In this country it is not anyones right to force some to believe or not too, this nation was based on freedom of speech and freedom of belief, and if we are going to a beacon in the future for people seeking freedom, that idea must be accepted.
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2015/12/14/group-disrupts-catholic-mass-in-las-vegas-n2093502
http://www.cruxnow.com/faith/2015/11/17/why-dont-catholics-read-the-bible/
In all that horror, what kept evil at bay? Simple kindness and mercy and love. The Christmas truce during World War I, a German fighter escorting a damaged U.S. bomber to safety and German and American troops sharing Christmas together on the coldest nights during the Battle of the Buldge of World War II.
I think it is said best in this quote from the "Hobbit" films:
"…I don't know. Saruman believes it is only great power that can hold evil in check. But that is not what I have found. I've found it is the small things, everyday deeds of ordinary folk that keeps the darkness at bay. Simple acts of kindness and love. Why Bilbo Baggins? Perhaps it is because I am afraid… and he gives me courage." - Gandalf.
In the legends and stories of Tolkien's "Middle-Earth, the concept of self-sacrifice is prevalent throughout his works. It's a very Christian concept to be willing give up one's life for another, that and generally being kind and helping to others. Today Christianity is associated with idea that it is a force that holds humanity back with it's demonization of science, and that as a religion, it is the source of war and evil in this world. Indeed, religion has been used as an excuse for war and the destruction of information. People have manipulated the concepts taught in religion to control others, it can be a terrifying source of power.
As a Catholic, I was never taught that my religion doesn't stop me from learning nor was it a source of power that controlled me. What I learned was more of being a good person and life lessons. Throughout my life I was never prevented from friending people who didn't share the same beliefs as me, in fact almost none of my friends are practicing Christians.
It wasn't until I was older that I saw the beliefs of other Christian denominations and the world's reactions. Christians who went out into the street and yelled at random people on the street, saying "you'll go to Hell if you don't convert." People who just seemed so blinded by their faith. I can appreciate a devotion to ones faith, but when it makes you so blind that you judge others without any knowledge, your no longer following the Christian ethic. "Judge not others, lest you be judged."
The media has take this recent tide of right-wing evangelical ideology and helped fume the flames of a "War on Religion." People who are religious, especially Christians, are bigots and hateful people who want to turn this country into a theocracy. But instead of focusing their reporting on the groups that preach hateful interpretations, they lump everyone into one group. All Christians are people who want to bring us back technologically and scientifically, and are violent hateful people who use the Bible as their justification. Those people exist, but they don't represent every Christian.
Being this time of year, lets ask the question below and look at whats going with religion in our society.
Is there a a war on Christmas?
This is a question with a yes and a no answer. Every year almost we hear on the news the "War on Christmas", how society is trying to remove it with sayings like "Happy Holidays", and this year the controversy over the minimalist Starbucks red cup. In reality, however, this isn't the truth, there really isn't a war. No one is stopping you from putting up a tree and decorating, shopping for presents, or celebrating in general, it's become very much a part of American society.
The true war on Christmas is the commercialization of the holiday. Images are broadcast on the news of people streaming into stores on Black Friday, like the orcs when they breach the gates of "Minas Tirth." They storm in for the deals and likely spend more on themselves than others. Moreover, Christmas has been turned into this period of intense shopping where we focus more on material processions than the true meaning of the holiday and that it's a time to spend with friends and loved ones. Gifts are a nice part of the holiday, but not everything.
Is there a war on Religion?
In this country at the world as a whole, yes there is. The push for secularism isn't a bad thing, secular countries tend to have more religious tolerance and acceptance. But there seems to be a push to completely push religion out of society totally. There is an idea that religion is holding society back on social issues and the advancement of technology, while historically this isn't necessarily true, there are religious elements today that do this. Evangelicals, especially the more fundamentalist ones, refuse to recognize parts of science that seemingly contradict with their literal interpretation of the "Bible." As well as demand that parts of society be suppressed for the same contradiction.
This, coupled with the rise of violent Islamic extremism, has led many to believe that religion is an evil in this, a relic that needs to be stamped out. It is the source of oppression, violence, war, and is anti-knowledge. Through media and especially social media, religion has been put down as a source of evil. But with the belittling and seeming hatred towards religion, many have sought a safe place with the more radical religious, a place where they can gather and be open with their faith. Not a bad thing, but this does have it's consequences, as many evangelicals have been aggressive in their efforts to convert, as was the scene at a Catholic church in Las Vegas (linked below).
It's the classic tale of two sides attacking one another, but only finding themselves strengthening the other. While it may seem that the atheists and non-religious are winning, faith can be a powerful motivator and weapon, again, just look at the Middle-east. Like a cornered cat, they will lash back with great ferocity.
As a Catholic, I feel myself set in this battle between both sides, disliked by each. The Evangelical / Protestant crowd has had a history of hate towards Catholics (not everyone), they consider us polytheists because of the "Trinity", worshipers of idols, and blind followers of the "devil" Pope. Meanwhile, atheists lump us in with the rest of religious extremists as bigots and hateful people. I can not express in "clean" words how much all this sends me into a rage. The accusations, insults, and belittling have made me feel completely unwelcome in this country, despite being third generation born here, and the media doesn't help. We're supposed to be a nation of tolerance and acceptance, but it only works on a double-standard depending upon who is in political power.
So, let me explain what it means for me to be Catholic. Historically, the Catholic Church have done some awful things, but they have also been the ones to fund social programs and many of the oldest universities in Europe. They worked towards the translation and preservation of classic works, this includes monks saving many Mayan and Aztec works of literature. They were also the patrons of art, and yes even science. The current calendar was created by a Pope in the 1500s, and the "big bang theory" was proposed by a Catholic priest. Monks were know to practice botany, and possibly as a result have made some of the best beer ever made, "Abbey Ale".
Being a Catholic doesn't mean blinding yourself to knowledge, nor trying to purge society of "undesirables." I've always looked at being a Catholic as spiritual and a moral guide to being a good person. We study the "Bible" in a analytical way, not literal, it's a collection of historical accounts, fables, psalms, and lessons. It was written by people trying to make sense of the world that they live in, thus it can't contradict science. However, science can not contradict the existence of God. The Universe is a vast and we know less than a fraction of what it contains. You CAN have your cake and eat it too.
I've come to believe that it wasn't physical appearance, but a creative spirt of God that we were created in the image of. There is a infinity to creativity, God, and the Universe. While yes, other creatures do have the ability to create very simple tools and shelters, none, of the complexity of human creative mind.
Finally, if there is one the thing I have gained from being Catholic is that, we're human, and we are not perfect, and to accept that. We are to strive to be better people and accept the flaws ourselves and others, and show respect. As I have said, I would never try to tell someone what to believe, I would need to be 100% secure in my faith, and part of the journey. I would help someone on that journey, but never force anyone into it. The Church itself is run by humans, thus it is an imperfect organization, but at it's core is a goal to help build a better world. I don't judge it by the people, including the clergy involved in the sex scandals, nor the few jackass priests I have met in my life.
In conclusion, religion is and will be a part of our society for the foreseeable future. People will believe in beings they can not see and follow the teachings with much vigor. If we are to move forward as a society we must accept these people, and recognize those who wish to use it as a means of power and control, as a means to spread fear and hate. Religion is not evil, only this who manipulate it for their own selfish means. In this country it is not anyones right to force some to believe or not too, this nation was based on freedom of speech and freedom of belief, and if we are going to a beacon in the future for people seeking freedom, that idea must be accepted.
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gregorian_calendar
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/christinerousselle/2015/12/14/group-disrupts-catholic-mass-in-las-vegas-n2093502
http://www.cruxnow.com/faith/2015/11/17/why-dont-catholics-read-the-bible/
To provide some context.
To give some context to the post I made earlier, it was supposed to be a response to a captioned picture a friend posted, but I thought it would better here. It deals with the struggles (in a humorous manor) of life. You try to make yourself look happy, but in realty your "stumbling" through life without to much direction looking for purpose.
I am 27 years old, and due to financial circumstances, I still live at home. In many ways I feel as if I am stuck in this sort of "middle area", between being a young person and being an adult (of some sort). What's my direction? What will the future hold? What am I doing with my life? In short, I'm scatter brained. Trying to answer those questions, while dealing with work, bills, and the long process of writing a novel series.
Childhood does look like a simpler period time, you didn't have as much freedom to make decisions or go where you want, but everything seemed to just fall into place. Nothing to worry about, just do your homework and then go watch TV and play with your legos, or decide what video game you'll play next. Again, simple.
Now, you have to decide whether or not jump headfirst into life decisions or plan it out and throughly. You have to think about money and deal with the cruel tricks life throws at you. The crazy dreams are tempered by reality and the world expects you to be one way and you would prefer to be something else. You try to act like an adult, but you would rather be a kid again.
It's all confusing, hell, what I just wrote might make no sense to most, but life doesn't seem to make any, anyways. I guess the question in the end is, what is the meaning of life? Perhaps it just to be a good person and give to society. Or maybe there is a spiritual aspect to it. Or it could simply be different per-person. But when but it's you, you'll likely know.
I am 27 years old, and due to financial circumstances, I still live at home. In many ways I feel as if I am stuck in this sort of "middle area", between being a young person and being an adult (of some sort). What's my direction? What will the future hold? What am I doing with my life? In short, I'm scatter brained. Trying to answer those questions, while dealing with work, bills, and the long process of writing a novel series.
Childhood does look like a simpler period time, you didn't have as much freedom to make decisions or go where you want, but everything seemed to just fall into place. Nothing to worry about, just do your homework and then go watch TV and play with your legos, or decide what video game you'll play next. Again, simple.
Now, you have to decide whether or not jump headfirst into life decisions or plan it out and throughly. You have to think about money and deal with the cruel tricks life throws at you. The crazy dreams are tempered by reality and the world expects you to be one way and you would prefer to be something else. You try to act like an adult, but you would rather be a kid again.
It's all confusing, hell, what I just wrote might make no sense to most, but life doesn't seem to make any, anyways. I guess the question in the end is, what is the meaning of life? Perhaps it just to be a good person and give to society. Or maybe there is a spiritual aspect to it. Or it could simply be different per-person. But when but it's you, you'll likely know.
Random thought of the Day.
Many of us stumble through life trying to find purpose in something, the meaning of life. We set goals and then wonder are they worth it or is there an better way to accomplish it or we just get lazy. We want the simplicity of when we were younger, but also the excitement that we always dreamed of, but settle on the reasonable middle because...eh. You can't decide on sushi or steak, but compromise on the chicken, because it's guaranteed to satisfy and taste good without making you feel like you've just ingested half a cow or whether or not you should jump at something so exotic to your pallet. And perhaps, at some point, you come to a conclusion, that life is a confusing set of decisions and the answer will hit you in the face like an exploding samsung battery and........ I'm not sure, I'm just rambling at this point. Maybe there is no spoon.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)